Did this analysis satisfy its configured numerical stopping criteria?
LAB / SA-CIR-SPICE-CONVERGENCE-EVIDENCE-061
SPICE convergence evidence
one solved run, five separate states
Compare timestep, tolerance, initial state, saved signals, metric definitions, and a deliberate singular operating point. Every case retains its settings, source trace, status reason, and non-claim boundary.
PRECOMPUTED EVIDENCE / CURRENT TAB ONLY
A solved run is one status, not the whole evidence chain.
9 cases5 independent axes0 server runs
SELECTED CASE
Under-resolved / tight / 500 ps
The converged trace exceeds at least one locked refinement tolerance.
- PASS
- 2
- FAIL
- 1
- NOT RUN
- 2
RUN STATUS
Five axes, no automatic propagation
Converged is not validated. Read each column independently.
| Case | Solver | Numerical | Model | Metric | Signoff | Delay |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PASS | PASS | NOT RUN | PASS | NOT RUN | 693.146778 ps | |
| PASS | PASS | NOT RUN | PASS | NOT RUN | 693.191372 ps | |
| PASS | FAIL | NOT RUN | PASS | NOT RUN | 693.612769 ps | |
| PASS | PASS | NOT RUN | PASS | NOT RUN | 693.171248 ps | |
| PASS | NOT RUN | NOT RUN | PASS | NOT RUN | 405.674593 ps | |
| PASS | FAIL | NOT RUN | PASS | NOT RUN | 575.236905 ps | |
| PASS | NOT RUN | NOT RUN | FAIL | NOT RUN | - | |
| PASS | PASS | NOT RUN | FAIL | NOT RUN | 697.548110 ps | |
| FAIL | NOT RUN | NOT RUN | NOT RUN | NOT RUN | - |
Does refinement keep the scoped waveform and metric inside locked tolerances?
Has the model been validated for the intended physical range?
Are required signals, thresholds, direction, and interpolation compatible?
Has an independent governed flow accepted the result for its stated use?